<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Language on Daniel Lyons</title><link>https://dandylyons.net/topics/language/</link><description>Recent content in Language on Daniel Lyons</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-gb</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2025 11:12:48 -0600</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://dandylyons.net/topics/language/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Curiosity Silenced the Uncurious Cat</title><link>https://dandylyons.net/thoughts/curiosity-silenced-the-uncurious-cat/</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2025 11:12:48 -0600</pubDate><guid>https://dandylyons.net/thoughts/curiosity-silenced-the-uncurious-cat/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;strong>Curiosity killed the cat&lt;/strong> or so the saying goes. What does this mean? Be careful. Don&amp;rsquo;t be curious. You just might get yourself hurt. Better to stay at home, safe and sound.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;strong>Except that&amp;rsquo;s not at all what the saying says.&lt;/strong> The &lt;a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curiosity_killed_the_cat">full saying&lt;/a> is:&lt;/p>
&lt;blockquote>
&lt;p>&lt;em>&amp;ldquo;Curiosity killed the cat,&lt;br>
But satisfaction brought it back.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/em>&lt;/p>
&lt;/blockquote>
&lt;p>Curiosity brings danger, uncertainty, and sometimes even death. But sometimes curiosity brings &lt;strong>satisfaction&lt;/strong>. Curiosity requires risk, and risk is the potential for reward. Historically the people who have been the most rewarded are among those who took the greatest risks. (Of course, the ones who have been the most punished are also among those who took the greatest risks.) Wisdom, is the ability to discern which risks are worth taking.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>On the Ambuguities of Sorry</title><link>https://dandylyons.net/essays/on-the-ambuguities-of-sorry/</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://dandylyons.net/essays/on-the-ambuguities-of-sorry/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="introduction">Introduction&lt;/h2>
&lt;p>In the modern cultural landscape, few phrases are as scrutinized, debated, and often dismissed as the public apology. When a public figure faces backlash, warranted or not, the inevitable &amp;ldquo;sorry&amp;rdquo; statement often follows. Yet, these pronouncements frequently ring hollow, sounding more like carefully crafted PR than genuine contrition. This pervasive sense of inauthenticity highlights a deeper issue: the inherent ambiguity embedded within the word &amp;ldquo;sorry&amp;rdquo; itself. This ambiguity transforms apologies into a societal Rorschach test, fueling division and tribalism, and underscores a critical need for greater clarity in our language and interactions.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>