<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Reality on Daniel Lyons</title><link>https://dandylyons.net/topics/reality/</link><description>Recent content in Reality on Daniel Lyons</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-gb</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2025 07:21:38 -0600</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://dandylyons.net/topics/reality/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>It Looks Like AI</title><link>https://dandylyons.net/thoughts/it-looks-like-ai/</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2025 07:21:38 -0600</pubDate><guid>https://dandylyons.net/thoughts/it-looks-like-ai/</guid><description>&lt;p>Several years ago I went on a hike with friends through a lush tropical forest. We turned the corner and saw a stunning lookout with dense green trees strewn across a wide valley as far as the eye could see. Then a friend of mine said one of the most ludicrous sentences I have ever heard in my life:&lt;/p>
&lt;blockquote>
&lt;p>&lt;em>&amp;ldquo;Meh. The graphics are better on my PC.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/em>&lt;/p>
&lt;/blockquote>
&lt;p>What in the world? That doesn&amp;rsquo;t make any sense. How would videogame graphics be better than real life? It doesn&amp;rsquo;t matter how many polygons your graphics card can render, there is no way that it can render the infinite polygons of actual reality. Nevertheless, what he said stuck with me.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>